Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The weak, "strong" e4-pawn

  • GM Gserper
  • | 23 gru 2012
  • | 13062 odsłon
  • | 22 komentarzy

Before I explain the strange title of today's article, let me show you what kind of position we are going to discuss:

This kind of position can happen in many different openings (we can assume that there are many more pieces besides pawns in the position) after Black 'surrenders' the center by an e5 x d4 trade of the central pawns. At first it looks like White should have a clear advantage due to his strong presence in the center and spatial advantage marked by the e4 pawn. You can find many games that argue this point and the next classical and very famous game is one of them:


This game has a funny story.  Since it was a super tournament, only players who won some major tournaments in the past were invited.  The only exception was Capablanca who was just a rising star at that point, but he was invited since the organizers could see that he had a very bright future.  Some of the participants were strongly against Capablanca's participation in the tournament and Bernstein was one of them. The game Capablanca - Bernstein played in the very first round silenced the doubters.

Anyway, it was easy to see the numerous advantages of the strong central e4 pawn and therefore the e5xd4 trade that 'surrenders' the center was called a positional mistake by many top authorities of that time.  However, if you are open minded enough to look at the position without bias, you can notice some positive sides of Black's position as well.  Of course, I am talking about use of the 'e' file. Also, if you take into the account that the 'strong' e4 pawn is located on this exact open file, you can easily imagine some situations where such a pawn can become a liability. One of the first examples of such 'out of the box' thinking can be found in the next classical game. Look at the next diagram and count how many Black pieces attack the poor e4 pawn!


Games like this led to a revolution in positional understanding. If old masters (around Capablanca & Rubinstein's time) saw a currently theoretical position from the Fianchetto variation of the King's Indian, they would probably call it strategically winning for White.  Judge for yourself:

But many strong Grandmasters like Boleslavsky, Geller and especially Bronstein have proved that the position is absolutely playable for Black. We analyzed two classical Bronstein games in this system here:

http://www.chess.com/article/view/kings-indian-defense-according-to-bronstein

 This positional concept of the strong central e4 pawn being very weak sometimes is very well known now, and yet sometimes even very strong chess players fall for it.  The next game from a Candidates Match is a good example.  Spassky was on his way to the World Champion title, yet his loss looks very similar to the Tarrasch-Chigorin game we analyzed above:


As you could see, Spassky didn't lose his central e4 pawn, but he had to defend it with almost all of his pieces, which made them very passive.  So it is a difference in the activity of the White and Black pieces which eventually caused his defeat.

The next game of a young Alexey Shirov shows a similar situation:


As you can see, the central e4 pawn can be both an asset and a liability, it all depends on the position.  I hope that after reading this article, your own central pawns will always remain strong and if it is your opponent who has such a pawn, he will regret it!  Smile

Good luck!

Komentarze


  • 16 miesięcy temu

    shahrokh1975

    thanks!

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    Punisher-X

    Capablanca !!!!

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    CheckMonster

    Very nice article! How about e4 pawn in Sicilian defense? I am curious about its pros and cons...Undecided

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    MitjaMarkovic

    Great one!

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    bolshevikhellraiser

    Very impressive game by Chigorion. He definitely  played at a high-grandmaster level. His peices seemed to be coincidently placed on the right squares at the right time, and there were so many sound sacrifices. I like the final position in particularly where the only thing black could do is defend the knight with his queen with Qf1, which is met by the promotion of the h pawn. It must be captured by the king or queen deflecting the protector of the knight, leaving it to be captured on the next move.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    peruh

    @Seraphimity:

    White is an officer down

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    Seraphimity

    On the last puzzle, could someone please explain why white's resigns.  I get white is on the rope's but just can't see it.  Is thier a forced mate I am missing or is it that positionally it is lost.  Thanks!~

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    maheshroks

    nice

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    KINGRAMSESII

    Fine article.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    Nusons

    Merry Christmas everyone :)

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    ClarkJohnAlmighty

    Merry Christmas to all here at chess.com

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    xela58

    "Merry Christmas and Prosperous New Year" to everyone. Advance happy 2013 to all Chess.com members,supporters. . . all people within. Thanks very much !!!.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    sryiwannadraw

    thank you

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    VeaceslaA

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 16 miesięcy temu

    peruh

    Fantastic play by Chigorin. Especially between move 29 and 32. He rejected the static play promoted by Tarrasch. He inspired the Sovjet school with Kotov, Keres, Bronstein etc. Great game.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    Imp3ri0

    Thank's for the article, love it. Merry chistmas to everyone. 

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    IndestructibleKing

    I agree with plutonia.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    plutonia

    Interesting article.

    I've always thought that the e4 pawn was strong because, unlike the IQP, if necessary it can be supported by f3.

    I did feel the pain of the e4 pawn in some blitz games where I was too ambitious playing f4.

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    cookie3

    very instructive....thank you!

Powrót na górę

Wyślij odpowiedź: