16976 zalogowanych graczy!
Człowiek kontra maszyna - powodzenia!
Gra korespondencyjna - grasz, kiedy Ci pasuje!
Głosuj na najlepszy ruch, aby wygrać!
Gotów na wyzwanie?
Wyostrz swój zmysł taktyczny!
Porady i sugestie
Ucz się od najlepszych graczy i zawodowców!
Przeglądaj miliony gier mistrzów!
Twój wirtualny trener szachowy!
Udoskonal swoje debiuty!
Sprawdź się grając z komputerem!
Znajdź prywatnego trenera dla siebie!
Dasz radę rozwiązać je każdego dnia?
Złóż to w całość!
Początkujący, zacznijcie tutaj!
Zaprzyjaźnij się i graj drużynowo!
Wiadomości ze świata szachów!
Wyszukaj użytkowników Chess.com!
Znajdź lokalne kluby i wydarzenia!
Kto jest Twoim najlepszym przyjacielem?
Przeczytaj, o czym piszą użytkownicy!
Indeed. Also it's worth pointing out that nobody was even close to doing what Kasparov did with the ratings once he left; he left a big hole in the world of professional chess, a clear number one quitting while he was ahead. Carlsen has filled that hole.
Now that I think about it, I could name ONE other player who quit like that......
Was back in the 70's, I believe.......
The difference, of course, being that Kasparov had spent five years chasing a rematch with Kramnik, in the interim playing in and winning virtually every major tournament, and demonstrating against the best of the younger generation that he was still the world's dominant player.
Fischer, in contrast, refused to put his title on the line, even outside of FIDE auspices, or even to play a single serious tournament game for twenty years and then would only meet his former antagonist Spassky, then well past his competitive years.
Yes, that is quite a difference.
Then there was Morphy. Pretty sure he was #1 his last game as well.
Would his case be closer to a Bobby, or a Garry?
(P.S. I actually bet 5 pounds on Spassky in the rematch.)
Nobody argued about the Fisher clear superiority when he was at his peak. His only worthy opponent could be Misha Tal, who already had serious health problems.
But Bobby was clever enough to see that Karpov was a much harder nut to crack than poor Boris, or the declining Tigran (which was not able to capitalize against him in a prepared opening line which gave him a very big advantage. He did not win the game, factly, he even went on to lose). How hard would be Karpov? (too hard? - who knows...) and he deliberately declined defending his title.
OK OK OK I admit that Mr.Carlsen is not the worst player ever. Happy now ?
Admit that you are potentially the worst troll ever, and then everything will be settled...
Daniel Kings YouTube Chess Channel.
Might not be for everyone but I like his presentation. Negatively he has an obsession with bishops and likes to sidetrack off into cunning traps that never happened (nor were likely to). That said, I suscribed to him during the World Championship match and have never regretted it. I think my chess has improved too, also like his Najdorf series though not enough to give up my beloved Kan.
GreedyPawnEater kilka minut temu
1001-2000 worst things to do while playing chess
ChessPlayinDude47 kilka minut temu
What other interests do you have apart from Chess?
Fiveofswords kilka minut temu
Best Chess.com members.
kaynight kilka minut temu
QGA--What do you do if Black tries to keep pawn?
K_Brown kilka minut temu
Why did Fischer condemn 1. d4 ?
GreedyPawnEater 5 minut temu
Nothing special just a solid game
Thomas9400 8 minut temu
?Why is the Italian good for novice ?
GreedyPawnEater 14 minut temu
8/2/2015 - Maintaining Focus
BryanCFB 15 minut temu
Chess and Math
GreedyPawnEater 20 minut temu
Dlaczego warto dołączyć | Tematy szachowe |
O nas |
Najczęstsze pytania |
Pomoc i wsparcie |
Polityka prywatności |
Regulamin serwisu |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Szachy - Polski
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!