Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Komentarze


  • 12 miesięcy temu

    healthybrick

    In the third game why not ...Kh6?

  • 16 miesięcy temu

    systematis

    Tactics literally means ways of touching. In chess, it translates to the ways of attacking your opponents pieces, because the word attack (a-tack) literally means to touch repeatedly or continuously.

    A fork, attacking two or more pieces simultaneously, is one way of attacking, one tactic.

    A skewer, attacking a piece which is on the same line as a less valuable piece, is another way of attacking, another tactic.

  • 17 miesięcy temu

    Kyurem88

    Coolcool video

  • 22 miesięcy temu

    kauboy

    yes it succeeds. there's no one to attack the queen on g4?

  • 2 lat temu

    pumpupthevolume247

    Immense!! Cool

  • 2 lat temu

    NM Bab3s

    1. Bxh7+ Kxh7 2. Ng5+ Kg6 (2...Kg8 3. Qh5 Rd8 4. Qxf7+ Kh8 5. Qh5+ Kg8 6. Qh7+ Kf8 7. Qh8+ Ke7 8. Qxg7#) (2...Kh6 3. Nxe6+ +-) 3. Qg4 f6 (3...f5 4. Qh4 transposes) (3...Ne3 4. Bxe3 Bxe3 5. Nxe6+ +-) (3...Nf6 4. exf6 Kxf6 5. Ne4+ +-) 4. Qe4+ f5 5. Qh4 (threatening Qh7#) f4 6. Qh7+ Kxg5 7. h4+ Kg4 8. Qg6+ Kxh4 9. g3+ fxg3 (9...Kh3 10. Qh5#) 10. Qxg3+ Kh5 11. Qg5#

    You have to highlight the blank space above to see my answer to the puzzle at the end of the video. I think I got everything. This specific pattern works thanks to the e5 pawn, which divides the board in two, and to Black's undeveloped queenside, which keeps 5...Rh8 from working.

  • 2 lat temu

    receipt1

    Great advice....try to identify and understand the details!

  • 2 lat temu

    flatseven

    Excellent.  Question: How do I go about setting up my own studies in this way?  That is, how can I find a number of games with similar endings?

    Thanks.

  • 2 lat temu

    DrFrank124c

    Great video. I have used this specific combination many times, sometimes I won, sometimes I lost. Now I understand how to judge in advance whether or not the sacrifice will succeed. And I can extrapolate this idea to other "speculative" sacrifices as well.  

  • 2 lat temu

    jdm

    I enjoyed it very much.  I could never feel the nuances of the slightly different positions.  For me, a piece sacrifice always seems to get me beat, except if I can see checkmate in a couple of moves.  I find that the "feel" I thought I had for the position was just a toilet urge.  Wink

  • 2 lat temu

    nicschne

    perhaps the first 6 minutes spent talking is a bit much

  • 2 lat temu

    Wzntz

    I enjoyed your explanations and the video.

  • 2 lat temu

    aubz

    thanks Gregory, another brilliant video. not only highly instructive but highly entertaining too.

  • 2 lat temu

    domick

    another helpful tactics on blitz game

  • 2 lat temu

    biriboy

    very helpful

  • 2 lat temu

    BYaniw

    @JonnyTurgi- Horrible spelling of specifically.

  • 2 lat temu

    JonnyTurgi

    Wow very instructive indeed pattern recognition is an important fctor in chess but i think what makes a exeptionnal player is when he recognize the pattern but he is able to EVALUATE and JUDGE the resulting position specifictly with the position on the board by visualizing it carefully before going there. In that field a player who paved the way is Alexander Alekhine he was very strong positionnaly but tacticaly he would makes lets say a three moces combo and visualize the resulting position with clockwork precision and more important evaluate and judge it acurately. I think that in life and in chess judgement is what makes people smart and computing abilities are of course important but even caluating 12 moves ahead is useless if we cannot judge the result at the end. Thanks Gregory!

  • 2 lat temu

    DonLawson

    Enjoyed the insights!Laughing

  • 2 lat temu

    gnuandspeedo

    I liked this presentation about pattern recognition at various levels.

  • 2 lat temu

    chessmaster19898

    Great Vedio GM Kaidanov.Smile

Powrót na górę

Wyślij odpowiedź: