• 3 lat temu


    In the third game why not ...Kh6?

  • 3 lat temu


    Tactics literally means ways of touching. In chess, it translates to the ways of attacking your opponents pieces, because the word attack (a-tack) literally means to touch repeatedly or continuously.

    A fork, attacking two or more pieces simultaneously, is one way of attacking, one tactic.

    A skewer, attacking a piece which is on the same line as a less valuable piece, is another way of attacking, another tactic.

  • 3 lat temu


    Coolcool video

  • 4 lat temu


    yes it succeeds. there's no one to attack the queen on g4?

  • 4 lat temu


    Immense!! Cool

  • 4 lat temu

    NM Bab3s

    1. Bxh7+ Kxh7 2. Ng5+ Kg6 (2...Kg8 3. Qh5 Rd8 4. Qxf7+ Kh8 5. Qh5+ Kg8 6. Qh7+ Kf8 7. Qh8+ Ke7 8. Qxg7#) (2...Kh6 3. Nxe6+ +-) 3. Qg4 f6 (3...f5 4. Qh4 transposes) (3...Ne3 4. Bxe3 Bxe3 5. Nxe6+ +-) (3...Nf6 4. exf6 Kxf6 5. Ne4+ +-) 4. Qe4+ f5 5. Qh4 (threatening Qh7#) f4 6. Qh7+ Kxg5 7. h4+ Kg4 8. Qg6+ Kxh4 9. g3+ fxg3 (9...Kh3 10. Qh5#) 10. Qxg3+ Kh5 11. Qg5#

    You have to highlight the blank space above to see my answer to the puzzle at the end of the video. I think I got everything. This specific pattern works thanks to the e5 pawn, which divides the board in two, and to Black's undeveloped queenside, which keeps 5...Rh8 from working.

  • 4 lat temu


    Great advice....try to identify and understand the details!

  • 4 lat temu


    Excellent.  Question: How do I go about setting up my own studies in this way?  That is, how can I find a number of games with similar endings?


  • 4 lat temu


    Great video. I have used this specific combination many times, sometimes I won, sometimes I lost. Now I understand how to judge in advance whether or not the sacrifice will succeed. And I can extrapolate this idea to other "speculative" sacrifices as well.  

  • 4 lat temu


    I enjoyed it very much.  I could never feel the nuances of the slightly different positions.  For me, a piece sacrifice always seems to get me beat, except if I can see checkmate in a couple of moves.  I find that the "feel" I thought I had for the position was just a toilet urge.  Wink

  • 4 lat temu


    perhaps the first 6 minutes spent talking is a bit much

  • 4 lat temu


    thanks Gregory, another brilliant video. not only highly instructive but highly entertaining too.

  • 4 lat temu


    another helpful tactics on blitz game

  • 4 lat temu


    very helpful

  • 4 lat temu


    @JonnyTurgi- Horrible spelling of specifically.

  • 4 lat temu


    Wow very instructive indeed pattern recognition is an important fctor in chess but i think what makes a exeptionnal player is when he recognize the pattern but he is able to EVALUATE and JUDGE the resulting position specifictly with the position on the board by visualizing it carefully before going there. In that field a player who paved the way is Alexander Alekhine he was very strong positionnaly but tacticaly he would makes lets say a three moces combo and visualize the resulting position with clockwork precision and more important evaluate and judge it acurately. I think that in life and in chess judgement is what makes people smart and computing abilities are of course important but even caluating 12 moves ahead is useless if we cannot judge the result at the end. Thanks Gregory!

  • 4 lat temu


    Enjoyed the insights!Laughing

  • 4 lat temu


    I liked this presentation about pattern recognition at various levels.

  • 4 lat temu


    Great Vedio GM Kaidanov.Smile

Powrót na górę

Wyślij odpowiedź: