• 10 miesięcy temu



  • 12 miesięcy temu



  • 22 miesięcy temu


    at 12:53 after blacks rook takes the f3 pawn, white does not have the resource qe5 because of rook f1+!!. so black would have been winning after qh4!

  • 2 lat temu


  • 3 lat temu

    GM dbojkov

    Thanks for these lines, taglit, indeed you have spotted nice tactics with the move Nxd4. After that things are not clear at all, in fact it seems as Black is better- 19...Nxd4 20.cxd4 Qd5 21.Qh3 fxg5,

     thanks again for analyzing the position in depth!

  • 3 lat temu


    Nice game and analysis. Appreciate your explanations. Anyway at 6:10 after R:e6, black doesn't have to take the bishop on g5, he can play N:d4! followed by Qd5 with a rook, bishop and mate on g2 hanging for white.. the situation is quite unclear. And at 14:57 the Kg7 defence is not analysed for black, probably white has more than a compensation for an exchange, but black is not mated.

  • 3 lat temu

    GM dbojkov

    Thanks, Michael for your answer to elindauer's question,

      greets everyone!

  • 3 lat temu


    Thanks, a very entertaining lesson

  • 3 lat temu


    at 17:50, you give e8Q Qe8 Qb7 winning the bishop as good for white, but doesn't black have Qe1+ with a perpetual at the end of this?  As in, Qe1 Kh2 Qe5 Kh3 Qf5 draw...  This seems like a critical position for white to show an advantage.



    Thanks for the entertaining video.

  • 3 lat temu


    Thank you for sharing the interesting game and for the instructive analysis! That was a really nice example of both a kingside attack and keeping the initiative.

  • 3 lat temu


    Excellent video once again.  Very instructive, and in-depth analysis.  Thank you sir.  Best Regards, EddieB ... P.S. love how you showed another opposite colored bishop attack to reinforce the previous lectures.  

  • 3 lat temu


    Thank you sir

Powrót na górę

Wyślij odpowiedź: